Causal Inference, Moral Intuition, and Modeling in a Pandemic

  • Stephanie Harvard Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Eric Winsberg Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida, Tampa

Abstract

Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, people have been eager to learn what factors, and especially what public health policies, cause infection rates to wax and wane. But figuring out conclusively what causes what is difficult in complex systems with nonlinear dynamics, such as pandemics. We review some of the challenges that scientists have faced in answering quantitative causal questions during the Covid-19 pandemic, and suggest that these challenges are a reason to augment the moral dimension of conversations about causal inference. We take a lesson from Martha Nussbaum—who cautions us not to think we have just one question on our hands when we have at least two—and apply it to modeling for causal inference in the context of cost-benefit analysis.

References

Abadie, Alberto. 2021. “Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects.” Journal of Economic Literature 59, no. 2: 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.2019145.

Cevik, Muge and Stefan D. Baral. 2021. “Networks of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission.” Science 373, no. 6551: 162–163. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0842.

Dave, Dhaval, Drew McNichols, and Joseph J. Sabia. 2020. “The Contagion Externality of a Superspreading Event: The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally and Covid-19.” Southern Economic Journal 87, no. 3: 769–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12475.

Doll, Richard. 2002. “Proof of Causality: Deduction from Epidemiological Observation.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45, no. 4: 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2002.0067.

Dowd, Jennifer Beam. 2020. “The Sturgis Biker Rally Did Not Cause 266,796 Cases of Covid-19.” Slate, September 10. https://slate.com/technology/2020/09/sturgis-rally-covid19-explosion-paper.html (accessed September 8, 2021).

Elliott, Kevin C. and Daniel J. McKaughan. 2009. “How Values in Scientific Discovery and Pursuit Alter Theory Appraisal.” Philosophy of Science 76, no. 5: 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1086/605807.

Harvard, Stephanie, Gregory R. Werker, and Diego S. Silva. 2020. “Social, Ethical, and Other Value Judgments in Health Economics Modeling.” Social Science & Medicine 253: 112975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112975.

Howick, Jeremy. 2011. The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

John, Stephen. 2020. “The Ethics of Lockdown: Communication, Consequences, and the Separateness of Persons.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, June 17. https://kiej.georgetown.edu/ethics-of-lockdown-special-issue/ (accessed September 8, 2021).

Madani, Doha. 2020. “Sturgis Rally May Have Caused More Than 250,000 New Coronavirus Cases, Study Finds.” NBC News, September 9. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sturgis-rally-may-have-caused-250-000-new-coronavirus-cases-n1239577 (accessed September 8, 2021).

Mitze, Timo, Reinhold Kosfeld, Johannes Rode, and Klaus Wälde. “Face Masks Considerably Reduce Covid-19 Cases in Germany.” PNAS 117, no. 51: 32293–32301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015954117.

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. “The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Journal of Legal Studies 29, no. S2. https://doi.org/10.1086/468103.

Prasad, Vinay. 2021. “Op-Ed: Do ‘Lockdowns’ Work?” Medpage Today, February 4. https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/vinay-prasad/91054 (accessed September 8, 2021).

Schliesser, Eric and Eric Winsberg. 2020. “Climate and Coronavirus: The Science Is Not the Same.” New Statesman, March 23. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/economy/2020/03/climate-coronavirus-science-experts-data-sceptics (accessed September 8, 2021).

Stegenga, Jacob. “Fast Science and Philosophy of Science.” BJPS Blog. http://www.thebsps.org/auxhyp/fast-science-stegenga/ (accessed September 8, 2021).

Published
2021-09-17
How to Cite
Harvard, S., & Winsberg, E. (2021). Causal Inference, Moral Intuition, and Modeling in a Pandemic. Philosophy of Medicine, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/philmed.2021.70
Section
The Examination Room