Equal Access to Parenthood and the Imperfect Duty to Benefit

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.151

Keywords:

Procreation, Parenthood, Infertility, Healthcare systems, ART, Procreative rights, Reproduction, Assisted reproductive technologies, Assisted reproduction, Involuntary childlessness

Abstract

Should involuntarily childless people have the same opportunities to access parenthood as those who are not involuntarily childless? In the context of assisted reproductive technologies, affirmative answers to this question are often cashed out in terms of positive rights, including rights to third-party reproduction. In this paper, we critically explore the scope and extent to which any such right would hold up morally. Ultimately, we argue for a departure away from positive parental rights. Instead, we argue that the state has an imperfect duty to benefit involuntarily childless people in relation to their parental aspirations.

References

Alday-Mondaca, Carolina and Siu Lay-Lisboa. 2021. “The Impact of Internalized Stigma on LGBT Parenting and the Importance of Health Care Structures: A Qualitative Study.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 10, art. 5373: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105373.

American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2014. “Avoiding Conflict in Third-Party Reproduction.” https://www.reproductivefacts.org/news-and-publications/fact-sheets-and-infographics/avoiding-conflict-in-third-party-reproduction/.

Associated Press. 2022. “Call for South Korea to Investigate Child Adoptions to Denmark.” Aljazeera, 23 August. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/23/call-for-south-korea-to-probe-children-adopted-to-denmark.

Awadalla, Michael S., Kristin A. Bendikson, Jacqueline R. Ho, Lynda K. McGinnis, and Ali Ahmady. 2021. “A Validated Model for Predicting Live Birth after Embryo Transfer.” Scientific Reports 11, art. 10800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90254-y.

Babakhanzadeh, Emad, Majid Nazari, Sina Ghasemifar, and Ali Khodadadian. 2020. “Some of the Factors Involved in Male Infertility: A Prospective Review.” International Journal of General Medicine 13: 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S241099.

Bernardo, Ángela. 2022. “Ten European Countries Pay Egg Donors Anywhere from 250 to 2,000 Euros.” Civio, 7 March. https://civio.es/medicamentalia/2022/03/07/egg-sperm-donors-financial-compensation-europe/.

Blackstone, Amy and Mahala Dyer Stewart. 2012. “Choosing to be Childfree: Research on the Decision Not to Parent.” Sociology Compass 6, no. 9: 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00496.x.

Blank, Robert H. 1997. “Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Rights: The Case of in Vitro Fertilization.” Politics and the Life Sciences 16, no. 2: 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0730938400024849.

Cavaliere, Giulia and César Palacios-González. 2018. “Lesbian Motherhood and Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Reproductive Freedom and Genetic Kinship.” Journal of Medical Ethics 44, no. 12: 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104450.

Chan, C.C.W. and Ho, P-C. 2006. “Infertility, Assisted Reproduction and Rights.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 20, no. 3: 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.001.

Childress, J.F. 1980. “Negative and Positive Rights.” Hastings Center Report 10, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560496.

Cohen, I. Glenn and Emily Jackson. 2022. “Introduction to the Right to Procreate and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Health Law, edited by David Orentlicher and Tamara K. Hervey,989–992. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Courtwright, Andrew M. and Mia W. Doron. 2007. “Is Restricting Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology an Infringement of Reproductive Rights?” American Medical Association Journal of Ethics 9, no. 9: 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2007.9.9.msoc1-0709.

Daniels, K.R. 2000. “To Give or Sell Human Gametes: The Interplay between Pragmatics, Policy and Ethics.” Journal of Medical Ethics 26, no. 3: 206–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.26.3.206.

Di Nucci, Ezio. 2011. “Sexual Rights and Disability.” Journal of Medical Ethics 37, no. 3: 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.036723.

Donchin, Anne. 2010. “In Whose Interest? Policy and Politics in Assisted Reproduction.” Bioethics 25, no. 2: 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01869.x.

Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2013. “Access to Fertility Treatment by Gays, Lesbians, and Unmarried Persons: A Committee Opinion.” Fertility and Sterility 100, no. 6: 1524–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.042.

Finn, Suki and Sasha Isaac. 2021. “Evaluating Ectogenesis via the Metaphysics of Pregnancy.” In Birthing Techno-Sapiens: Human Technology Co-evolution and the Future of Reproduction, edited by Robbie Davis-Floyd,136–148. Abingdon: Routledge.

Friedrich, Daniel. 2013. “A Duty to Adopt?” Journal of Applied Philosophy 30, no. 1: 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12003.

Gheaus, Anca. 2015. “Could There Ever Be a Duty to Have Children?” In Permissible Progeny? The Morality of Procreation and Parenting, edited by Sarah Hannan, Samantha Brennan, and Richard Vernon, 87–106. New York: Oxford University Press.

Heathwood, Chris. 2019. “Which Desires Are Relevant to Well-Being?” Noûs 53, no. 3: 664–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12232.

Herman, Barbara. 2021. “Kantian Imperfect Duties.” In The Moral Habitat. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896353.003.0008.

HFEA (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority). N.d. “Coping if Treatment Doesn’t Work.” https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/explore-all-treatments/coping-if-treatment-doesnt-work/.

Hope, Simon. 2023. “Perfect and Imperfect Duty: Unpacking Kant’s Complex Distinction.” Kantian Review 28, no. 1: 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415422000528.

Igneski, Violetta. 2006. “Perfect and Imperfect Duties to Aid.” Social Theory and Practice 32, no. 3: 439–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200632321.

Inhorn, Marcia C. 2009. “Right to Assisted Reproductive Technology: Overcoming Infertility in Low-Resource Countries.” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 106, no. 2: 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.034.

Johnson, Tess. 2021. “Free to Decide: The Positive Moral Right to Reproductive Choice.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31, no. 3: 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2021.0013.

Kinsinger, Frank Stuart. 2009. “Beneficence and the Professional’s Moral Imperative.” Journal of Chiropractic Humanities 16, no. 1: 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.echu.2010.02.006.

Kumar, Naina and Amit Kant Singh. 2015. “Trends of Male Factor Infertility, an Important Cause of Infertility: A Review of Literature.” Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 8, no. 4: 191–196. https://doi.org/10.4103%2F0974-1208.170370.

Lee, J.Y. 2023. “Surrogacy: Beyond the Commercial/Altruistic Distinction.” Journal of Medical Ethics 49, no. 3: 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-108093.

Meijers, Tim. 2020. “The Value in Procreation: A Pro‐Tanto Case for a Limited and Conditional Right to Procreate.” Journal of Value Inquiry 54, no. 4: 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-020-09734-5.

Parikh, Firuza Rajesh. 2013. “Affordable in Vitro Fertilization.” Fertility and Sterility 100, no. 2: 328–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.049.

Pennings, Guido. 2018. “Cross-Border Reproductive Care.” In Encyclopedia of Reproduction, edited by Michael K. Skinner, 387–390. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Peterson, M.M. 2005. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equity of Access Issues.” Journal of Medical Ethics 31, no. 5: 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.007542.

Quigley, Muireann. 2010. “A Right to Reproduce?” Bioethics 24, no. 8: 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00722.x.

Robertson, J.A. 1982. “The Right to Procreate and In Utero Fetal Therapy.” Journal of Legal Medicine 3, no. 3: 333–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648209513357.

Rulli, Tina. 2016. “The Ethics of Procreation and Adoption.” Philosophy Compass 11, no. 6: 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12330.

Segers, Seppe, Guido Pennings, and Heidi Mertes. 2019. “Getting What You Desire: The Normative Significance of Genetic Relatedness in Parent–Child Relationships.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22, no. 3: 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09889-4.

Shanner, Laura. 1995. “The Right to Procreate: When Rights Claims Have Gone Wrong.” McGill Law Journal 40, no. 4: 823–874. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/751491.

Shaw, Joshua. 2019. “Regulating Assisted Reproduction: Discrimination and the Right to Privacy.” Clinical Ethics 14, no. 2: 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477750919845086.

Spriggs, M. and T. Charles. 2003. “Should HIV Discordant Couples Have Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies?” Journal of Medical Ethics 29, no. 6: 325–329. https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fjme.29.6.325.

Statman, Daniel. 1996. “Who Needs Imperfect Duties?” American Philosophical Quarterly 33, no. 2: 211–224. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009859.

Timoney, Anne. 2022. “Data: Assisted Human Reproduction.” Library & Research Service, House of the Oireachtas (Ireland), 21 February. https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/libraryResearch/2022/2022-02-28_l-rs-note-assisted-human-reproduction-data_en.pdf.

Varkey, Basil. 2021. “Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice.” Medical Principles and Practice 30, no. 1: 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119.

Van Zyl, Liezl. 2002. “Intentional Parenthood and the Nuclear Family.” Journal of Medical Humanities 23, no. 2: 107–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014842031013.

Warnock, Mary. 2002. Making Babies: Is There a Right to Have Children? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Young, Thomas. 2001. “Overconsumption and Procreation: Are They Morally Equivalent?” Journal of Applied Philosophy 18, no. 2: 183–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00185.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-03

How to Cite

Lee, J., & Di Nucci, E. (2023). Equal Access to Parenthood and the Imperfect Duty to Benefit. Philosophy of Medicine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.151

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Analysis

License

Copyright (c) 2023 J.Y. Lee, Ezio Di Nucci

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
  9. The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.

Funding data