The DSM and Its Sociomedical Discontents

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.174

References

APA (American Psychiatric Association). 2013 “The People behind DSM-5”. https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM_People-Behind-DSM-5.pdf.

Carroll, Bernard J. 2013. “Biomarkers in DSM-5: Lost in Translation.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 47, no. 7: 676–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413491162.

Collier, Roger. 2010. “DSM Revision Surrounded by Controversy.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 182, no. 1: 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1503%2Fcmaj.109-3108.

Cornford, Francis M. 2014. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. London: Routledge.

Dai, Yunfei, Xin Yu, Zeping Xiao, Yifeng Xu, Min Zhao, João Mendonça Correia, Mario Maj, and Geoffrey M. Reed. 2014. “Comparison of Chinese and International Psychiatrists’ Views on Classification of Mental Disorders.” Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry 6, no. 3: 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12146.

Erasmus, Desiderius. 1876. In Praise of Folly. London: Reeves & Turner.

Foucault, Michel. 2003. Madness and Civilization. London: Routledge.

Frances, Allen. 2009. “Whither DSM–V?” British Journal of Psychiatry 195, no. 5: 391–392. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.073932.

———. 2013. “Saving Normal: An Insider’s Revolt against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life.” Psychotherapy in Australia 19, no. 3: 14–18. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.464019439257830.

GMI (Global Market Insights). 2023. “Psychotropic Drugs Market: By Drug Type, Application, Therapeutic Class, Disease, Distribution Channel, Global Forecast (2023–2032).” https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/psychotropic-drugs-market.

Hippocrates. 2009. The Law, Oath of Hippocrates, on the Surgery, and on the Sacred Disease. Translated by Francis Adams. Moscow: Dodo Press.

Homer. 2008. The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fitzgerald. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.

Kahn, Charles H. (ed.). 1981. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: A New Arrangement and Translation of the Fragments with Literary and Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Khoury, Bassam, Ellen J. Langer, and Francesco Pagnini. 2014. “The DSM: Mindful Science or Mindless Power? A Critical Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 5, 602. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2014.00602.

Kuroki, Toshihide, Makoto Ishitobi, Yoko Kamio, Genichi Sugihara, Toshiya Murai, Keisuke Motomura, Kazuyoshi Ogasawara, et al. 2016. “Current Viewpoints on DSM‐5 in Japan.” Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 70, no. 9: 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12421.

Phillips, Suzanne M. and Monique D. Boivin. 2007. “Medieval Holism: Hildegard of Bingen on Mental Disorder.” Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology 14, no. 4: 359–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ppp.0.0133.

Rosenberg, Robin S. 2013. “Abnormal Is the New Normal: Why Will Half the US Population Have a Diagnosable Mental Disorder?” Slate, 12 April. https://slate.com/technology/2013/04/diagnostic-and-statistical-manual-fifth-edition-why-will-half-the-u-s-population-have-a-mental-illness.html.

Szasz, Thomas S. 1960. “The Myth of Mental Illness.” American Psychologist 15, no. 2: 113–118. https://depts.washington.edu/psychres/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/100-Papers-in-Clinical-Psychiatry-Conceptual-issues-in-psychiatry-The-Myth-of-Mental-Illness.pdf.

Vanheule, Stijn. 2014. Diagnosis and the DSM: A Critical Review. New York: Palgrave Pivot.

Wang, Zhen, Yuan Wang, Qing Zhao, and Kaida Jiang. 2016. “Is the DSM-5 Hoarding Disorder Diagnosis Valid in China?” Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry 28, no. 2: 103–105. https://doi.org/10.11919%2Fj.issn.1002-0829.215054.

Wakefield, Jerome C. 2016. “Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5: Return of the False Positives Problem.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12, no. 1: 105–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112800.

Zheng, Y.P., K.M. Lin, J.P. Zhao, M.Y. Zhang, and D. Yong. 1994. “Comparative Study of Diagnostic Systems: Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders-Second Edition versus DSM-III-R.” Comprehensive Psychiatry 35, no. 6: 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440x(94)90227-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-08

How to Cite

Raudino, S., & Raudino, F. (2023). The DSM and Its Sociomedical Discontents. Philosophy of Medicine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.174

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Letters

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Simone Raudino, Francesco Raudino

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
  9. The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.