‘Isn’t Everyone a Little OCD?’
The Epistemic Harms of Wrongful Depathologization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2021.19Keywords:
Pathology, Epistemic Injustice, Mental Disorder, Psychiatry, Stereotypes, Pathophobia, Willful Ignorance, Trivialisation, Stigma, Psychiatric Classification, Obsessive Compulsive DisorderAbstract
This article develops the concept of wrongful depathologization, in which a psychiatric disorder is simultaneously stigmatized (because of sanist attitudes towards mental illness) and trivialized (as it is not considered a “proper” illness). We use OCD as a case study to argue that cumulatively these two effects generate a profound epistemic injustice to OCD sufferers, and possibly to those with other mental disorders. We show that even seemingly positive stereotypes attached to mental disorders give rise to both testimonial injustice and wilful hermeneutical ignorance. We thus expose an insidious form of epistemic harm that has been overlooked in the literature.
References
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
Barnes, Elizabeth. 2016. The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BBC News. 2018. “Gower Wedding Venue Sorry for ‘Slightly OCD’ Wanted Tweet.” BBC News, 19 March. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-43463065.
Bonnington, Oliver and Diana Rose. 2014. “Exploring Stigmatisation among People Diagnosed with Either Bipolar Disorder or Borderline Personality Disorder: A Critical Realist Analysis.” Social Science & Medicine 123: 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.048.
Bueter, Anke. 2019. “Epistemic Injustice and Psychiatric Classification.” Philosophy of Science 86, no. 5: 1064–1074. https://doi.org/10.1086/705443.
Chapman, Robert. 2019. “Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, edited by Şerife Tekin and Robyn Bluhm, 371–390. London: Bloomsbury Academic. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350024090.ch-018.
Cochran, Susan D., Jack Drescher, Eszter Kismödi, Alain Giami, Claudia García-Moreno, Elham Atalla, Adele Marais, Elisabeth Meloni Vieira, and Geoffrey M. Reed. 2014. “Proposed Declassification of Disease Categories Related to Sexual Orientation in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11).” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 92, no. 9: 672–679. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.14.135541.
Crichton, Paul, Havi Carel and Ian James Kidd. 2017. “Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry.” British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin, 41, no. 2: 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.050682.
Davis, Emmalon. 2016. “Typecasts, Tokens, and Spokespersons: A Case for Credibility Excess as Testimonial Injustice.” Hypatia 31, no. 3: 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12251.
Davis, Emmalon. 2018. “On Epistemic Appropriation.” Ethics 128, no. 4: 702–727. https://doi.org/10.1086/697490.
Dawson, David Laing. 2018. “A Psychiatrist Looks at Recovery and Finds It Wanting.” In Mind You: The Realities of Mental Illness; A Compilation of Articles from the Blog Mind You, edited by David Laing Dawson and Marvin Ross, 92–95. Dundas, ON: Bridgeross Communications.
Drescher, Jack. 2015. “Out of DSM: Depathologizing Homosexuality.” Behavioral Sciences 5, no. 4: 565–575. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fbs5040565.
Drummond, Lynne M. 2018. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: All You Want to Know about OCD For People Living with OCD, Carers, and Clinicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fennell, Dana and Michael Boyd. 2014. “Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in the Media.” Deviant Behavior 35, no. 9: 669–686. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/01639625.2013.872526.
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Good Morning Britain. 2015. “Michelle Mone on Her OCD and New Title.” Good Morning Britain, 13 October. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGwKmt5Gdwc.
Graby, Steve. 2015. “Neurodiversity: Bridging the Gap between the Disabled People’s Movement and the Mental Health System Survivors’ Movement.” In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by Helen Spandler, Jill Anderson, and Bob Sapey, 231–44. Bristol: Policy Press.
Greenberg, Gary. 2013. The Book of Woe: The DSM and the Unmaking of Psychiatry. Victoria: Scribe.
Halfmann, Drew. 2012. “Recognizing Medicalization and Demedicalization: Discourses, Practices, and Identities.” Health 16, no. 2: 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1363459311403947.
Huang, Yanshu, Paul G. Davies, Chris G. Sibley, and Danny Osborne. 2016. “Benevolent Sexism, Attitudes toward Motherhood, and Reproductive Rights: A Multi-Study Longitudinal Examination of Abortion Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 42, no. 7: 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167216649607.
Kay, Aaron C., Martin V. Day, Mark P. Zanna, and A. David Nussbaum. 2013. “The Insidious (and Ironic) Effects of Positive Stereotypes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49, no. 2: 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.003
Kidd, Ian James. 2019. “Pathophobia, Illness, and Vices.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27, no. 2: 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2019.1612625.
Krafft-Ebing, Richard Von. 1899. Psychopathia Sexualis. London: Hogarth Press.
Kurs, Rena and Alexander Grinshpoon. 2018. “Vulnerability of Individuals with Mental Disorders to Epistemic Injustice in Both Clinical and Social Domains.” Ethics & Behaviour 28, no. 4: 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1365302.
LeBlanc, Stephanie and Elizabeth Anne Kinsella. 2016. “Toward Epistemic Justice: A Critically Reflexive Examination of ‘Sanism’ and Implications for Knowledge Generation.” Studies in Social Justice 10, no. 1: 59–78. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v10i1.1324.
Li, Ang, Dongdong Jiao, and Tingshao Zhu. 2018. “Detecting Depression Stigma on Social Media: A Linguistic Analysis.” Journal of Affective Disorders 232: 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.087.
McCarty, Ryan J., Andrew G. Guzick, Lawton K. Swan, and Joseph P.H. McNamara. 2017. “Stigma and Recognition of Different Types of Symptoms in OCD.” Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 12: 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.12.006.
Medina, José. 2011. “The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary.” Social Epistemology 25, no. 1: 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2010.534568.
Mental Health Foundation. 2015. “Stigma and Discrimination.” Last modified 2015. https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/a-to-z/s/stigma-and-discrimination.
Pavelko, Rachelle L. and Jessica Gall Myrick. 2019. “Measuring Trivialization of Mental Illness: Developing a Scale of Perceptions That Mental Illness Symptoms Are Beneficial.” Health Communication 35, no. 5: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573296.
Perlin, Michael L. 1992. “On Sanism.” SMU Law Review 46, no. 2: 373–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/10379-002.
Pfohl, Bruce and Nancee S. Blum. 1991. “Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder: A Review of Available Data and Recommendations for DSM-IV.” Journal of Personality Disorders 5, no. 4: 363–375. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1521/pedi.1991.5.4.363.
Pohlhaus Jr, Gaile. 2012. “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Wilful Hermeneutical Ignorance.” Hypatia 27, no. 4: 715–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x.
Rashed, Mohammed Abouelleil. 2019. “In Defense of Madness: The Problem of Disability.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44, no. 2: 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy016.
Sanati, Abdi and Michalis Kyratsous. 2015. “Epistemic Injustice in Assessment of Delusions.” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21: 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12347.
Scrutton, Anastasia Philippa. 2017. “Epistemic Injustice and Mental Illness.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by Ian James Kidd, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. Abingdon: Routledge.
Seah, Xin Yi, Xiang Cong Tham, Netty Ryanie Kamaruzaman, and Piyanee Klainin Yobas. 2017. “Knowledge, Attitudes and Challenges of Healthcare Professionals Managing People with Eating Disorders: A Literature Review.” Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 31, no. 1: 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2016.09.002.
Shakespeare, Tom. 2018. Disability: The Basics. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sheldrick, Giles. 2019. “Richard Branson Cruise Line Says Sorry for Mocking OCD.” Express, 30 July. https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1159506/Richard-Branson-cruise-line-mocking-OCD.
Sholl, Jonathan. 2017. “The Muddle of Medicalization: Pathologizing or Medicalizing?” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38, no. 4: 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-017-9414-z.
Thornicroft, Graham. 2006. Shunned: Discrimination against People with Mental Illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Time to Change. 2012. “So, Why Don’t You Drive Then?” Time to Change, 9 February. https://www.time-to-change.org.uk/blog/so-why-dont-you-drive-then.
Time to Change. 2019. “Some People Are High-Functioning, but That Doesn’t Invalidate Their Mental Health.” Time to Change, 16 March. https://www.time-to-change.org.uk/blog/some-people-are-high-functioning-doesnt-invalidate-their-mental-health.
Walker, Nick. 2013. “Throw Away the Master’s Tools: Liberating Ourselves from the Pathology Paradigm.” Neurocosmopolitanism, 16 August. https://neurocosmopolitanism.com/throw-away-the-masters-tools-liberating-ourselves-from-the-pathology-paradigm/.
West, Lindsey M., Roxanne A. Donovan, and Amanda R. Daniel. 2016. “The Price of Strength: Black College Women’s Perspectives on the Strong Black Woman Stereotype.” Women & Therapy 39, no. 3–4: 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2016.1116871.
Wikipedia. 2021. “Monk (TV Series).” Last edited 19 March 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monk_(TV_series).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
- The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.