Pregnancy Is a Survival Pathology

A Biostatistical Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2025.214

Keywords:

Health, Disease, Pregnancy, biostatistical theory

Abstract

This paper argues that biostatistical theory (BST) cannot categorically exclude pregnancy from pathology. Common harmful conditions in typical pregnancies are integral to the notion of pregnancy per se. Given this definition, there are two potential ways to classify pregnancy as non-pathological within the BST: (i) most common conditions in pregnancy are not pathological within the appropriate reference class; or (ii) pregnancy’s reproductive value counterbalances its pathological survival harms, rendering it non-pathological. I challenge both views, arguing that non-pregnant women of the same age should be the reference class, making pregnancy a survival pathology that cannot be offset by reproductive value.

References

Baron, Teresa. 2024. “Pregnancy, Pain and Pathology: A Reply to Smajdor and Räsänen.” Journal of Medical Ethics 51, no. 1: 48–49. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-109921.

Bell, Graham. 1980. “The Costs of Reproduction and Their Consequences.” The American Naturalist 116, no. 1 (July): 45–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2460709.

Boorse, Christopher. 1975. “On the Distinction Between Disease and Illness.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 5, no. 1: 49–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265020.

———. 1976. “Wright on Functions.” The Philosophical Review 85, no. 1: 70–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184255.

———. 1977. “Health as a Theoretical Concept.” Philosophy of Science 44, no. 4: 542–573. https://doi.org/10.1086/288768.

———. 1997. “A Rebuttal on Health.” In What Is Disease?, edited by James M. Humber and Robert F. Almeder, 1–134. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-451-1_1.

———. 1999. “On the Distinction Between Disease and Illness.” In Meaning and Medicine: A Reader in the Philosophy of Health Care, edited by James Lindemann Nelson and Hilde Lindemann, 16–27. New York: Routledge.

———. 2002. “A Rebuttal on Functions.” In Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, edited by Andre Ariew, Robert C. Cummins, and Mark Perlman, 63–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2011. “Concepts of Health and Disease.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Medicine, edited by Fred Gifford, 13–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51787-6.50002-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51787-6.50002-7.

———. 2014. “A Second Rebuttal on Health.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39, no. 6: 683–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhu035.

Borumandnia, Neda, Hamidreza Alizadeh Majd, Neda Khadembashi, and Hamed Alaii. 2021. “Assessing the Trend of Infertility Rate in 198 Countries and Territories in Last Decades.” Iranian Journal of Public Health 50, no. 8: 1735–1737. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i8.6840.

Brown, Stephanie, and Judith Lumley. 1998. “Maternal Health After Childbirth: Results of an Australian Population Based Survey.” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 105, no. 2: 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10045.x.

Caplan, Arthur. 2017. “How Can Aging Be Thought of as Anything Other Than a Disease?” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine, edited by Thomas Schramme and Steven Edwards, 233–239. Dordrecht: Springer.

Cheng, Cynthia Y., and Qing Li. 2008. “Integrative Review of Research on General Health Status and Prevalence of Common Physical Health Conditions of Women After Childbirth.” Women's Health Issues 18, no. 4: 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.004.

Cooper, Rachel. 2002. “Disease.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33, no. 2: 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00018-3.

De Lange, Ann-Marie G., Tobias Kaufmann, Dennis van der Meer, Luigi A. Maglanoc, Dag Alnæs, Torgeir Moberget, Gwenaëlle Douaud, Ole A. Andreassen, and Lars T. Westlye. 2019. “Population-Based Neuroimaging Reveals Traces of Childbirth in the Maternal Brain.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 44: 22341–22346. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910666116.

DeVito, Scott. 2000. “On the Value-Neutrality of the Concepts of Health and Disease: Unto the Breach Again.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25, no. 5 : 539–567. https://doi.org/10.1076/0360-5310(200010)25:5;1-W;FT539.

Edqvist, Malin, Ingegerd Hildingsson, Maria Mollberg, Ingela Lundgren, and Helena Lindgren. 2017. “‘Midwives’ Management During the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Second-Degree Tears—An Experimental Study.” Birth 44: 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12267.

Felder, Jennifer N., Robert J. Baer, Lauren Rand, Jennifer L. Jelliffe-Pawlowski, and Aric A. Prather. 2017. “Sleep Disorder Diagnosis During Pregnancy and Risk of Preterm Birth.” Obstetrics & Gynecology 130, no. 3: 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002132.

Goosens, William K. 1980. “Values, Health, and Medicine.” Philosophy of Science 47, no. 1: 100–115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/187145.

Gould, Stephen Jay and Richard C. Lewontin. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences 205, no. 1161 (September 21): 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086.

Guerrero, J. David. 2010. “On a Naturalist Theory of Health: A Critique.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41, no. 3: 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.12.008.

Hausman, Daniel M. 2011. “Is an Overdose of Paracetamol Bad for One’s Health?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62, no. 3: 657–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axr008.

———. 2012. “Health, Naturalism and Functional Efficiency.” Philosophy of Science 79, no. 4: 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1086/668005.

———. 2014. “Health and Functional Efficiency.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39, no. 6: 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhu036.

Hern, Warren M. 1971. “Is Pregnancy Really Normal?” Family Planning Perspectives 3, no. 1 (January): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2133950.

Kingma, Elselijn. 2007. “What Is It to Be Healthy?” Analysis 67, no. 294: 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/67.2.128.

———. 2010. “Paracetamol, Poison, and Polio: Why Boorse’s Account of Function Fails to Distinguish Health and Disease.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61, no. 2: 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp034.

———. 2016. “Situation-Specific Disease and Dispositional Function.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67, no. 2: 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu041.

Lee, Elliott Kyung, Spencer Thomas Gutcher, and Alan Bruce Douglass. 2014. “Is Sleep-Disordered Breathing Associated with Miscarriages? An Emerging Hypothesis.” Medical Hypotheses 82, no. 4: 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2014.01.031.

Lewens, Tim. 2015. The Biological Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martínez-García, Magdalena, María Paternina-Die, Erika Barba-Müller, Daniel Martín de Blas, Laura Beumala, Romina Cortizo, Cristina Pozzobon, et al. 2021. “Do Pregnancy-Induced Brain Changes Reverse? The Brain of a Mother Six Years After Parturition.” Brain Sciences 11, no. 2: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020168.

National Health Service (NHS). N.d. “Pregnancy-Related Conditions.” https://www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/related-conditions/.

Nodine, Priscilla M., and Ellyn E. Matthews. 2013. “Common Sleep Disorders: Management Strategies and Pregnancy Outcomes.” Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 58, no. 4: 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12004.

Pritschet, Laura, Caitlin M. Taylor, Daniela Cossio, Joshua Faskowitz, Tyler Santander, Daniel A. Handwerker, Hannah Grotzinger, Evan Layher, Elizabeth R. Chrastil, and Emily G. Jacobs. 2024. “Neuroanatomical Changes Observed Over the Course of a Human Pregnancy.” Nature Neuroscience 27: 2253–2260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01741-0.

Rezkalla, Paul, and Emmanuel Smith. 2024. “Failing to Deliver: Why Pregnancy Is Not a Disease.” Journal of Medical Ethics 51, no. 1: 52–53. http://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-109956.

Roff, Derek A. 2002. Life History Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

Ryan, Calen P., Nanette R. Lee, Delia B. Carba, Julie L. MacIsaac, David T. Lin, Parmida Atashzay, Daniel W. Belsky, Michael S. Kobor, and Christopher W. Kuzawa. 2024. “Pregnancy Is Linked to Faster Epigenetic Aging in Young Women.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, no. 16, article e2317290121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2317290121.

Saier, Milton H. 2006. “Species Extinction.” Environmentalist 26: 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-006-7484-y.

Schwartz, Peter H. 2007. “Defining Dysfunction: Natural Selection, Design, and Drawing a Line.” Philosophy of Science 74, no. 3: 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1086/521970.

Smajdor, Anna, and Joona Räsänen. 2024. “Is Pregnancy a Disease? A Normative Approach.” Journal of Medical Ethics 51, no. 1: 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109651.

Subramani, Ramadevi, and Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy. 2017. “Pregnancy and Breast Cancer.” Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 151: 81–111. https://doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.07.006.

Thorell, Amanda. 2021. “Pathology as Reduced Efficiency: A Dispositional Approach.” Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 40, no. 1: 111–132. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27094756.

Van der Steen, Wim J., and P.J. Thung. 1988. Faces of Medicine: A Philosophical Study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Vogel, Joshua P., Jenny Jung, Tina Lavin, Grace Simpson, Dvora Kluwgant, Edgardo Abalos, Virginia Diaz, et al. 2024. “Neglected Medium-Term and Long-Term Consequences of Labour and Childbirth: A Systematic Analysis of the Burden, Recommended Practices, and a Way Forward.” The Lancet Global Health 12, no. 2: E317–E330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00454-0.

Wright, Larry. 1973. “Functions.” The Philosophical Review 82, no. 2: 139–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183766.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

Zhou, J. (2025). Pregnancy Is a Survival Pathology: A Biostatistical Approach. Philosophy of Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2025.214

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Original Research Articles (health, disease and illness)

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jolie Zhou

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
  9. The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.