“Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature

Can They Serve as Epistemic Markers to Assess the Integrity of Biomedical Information?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.164

Keywords:

Deontology, Editorial oversight, Ethics, Failed peer review, Nature of science, Nonsense text, Scientific ethos, Status quo testing, Truth

Abstract

Medical practitioners and healthcare workers rely on information accuracy in academic journals. Some Covid-19 papers contain “tortured phrases”, nonstandard English expressions, or imprecise or erroneous terms, that give the impression of jargon but are not. Most post-publication attention paid to Covid-19 literature has focused on the accuracy of biomedical aspects, the validity of claims, or the robustness of data, but little has been published on linguistic specificity. This paper highlights the existence of “tortured phrases” in select Covid-19 literature, arguing that they could serve as a class of epistemic marker when evaluating the integrity of the scientific and biomedical literature.

 

References

Älgå, Andreas, Oskar Eriksson, and Martin Nordberg. 2021. “The Development of Preprints during the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Internal Medicine 290, no. 2: 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13240.

Boon, Mieke and Sophie van Baalen. 2019. “Epistemology for Interdisciplinary Research: Shifting Philosophical Paradigms of Science.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9, art. 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4.

Brierley, Liam, Federico Nanni, Jessica K. Polka, Gautam Dey, Máté Pálfy, Nicholas Fraser, and Jonathon Alexis Coates. 2022. “Tracking Changes between Preprint Posting and Journal Publication during a Pandemic.” PLoS Biology 20, no. 2: e3001285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001285.

Cabanac, Guillaume, Cyril Labbé, and Alexander Magazinov. 2021. “Tortured Phrases: A Dubious Writing Style Emerging in Science—Evidence of Critical Issues Affecting Established Journals.” arXiv [preprint, not peer reviewed]: 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06751.

Chirico, Francesco and Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva. 2023. “Evidence-Based Policies in Public Health to Address Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.” Future Virology 18, no. 4: 261–273. https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2022-0028.

Cogan, Elie. 2022. “Preventing Fraud in Biomedical Research.” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 9, art. 932138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.932138.

Daly, Timothy. 2023. “Philosophers of Medicine Should Write More Letters for Medical Journals.” Philosophy of Medicine 4, no. 1: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.161.

Delardas, Orestis and Panagiotis Giannos. 2022. “How Covid-19 Affected the Journal Impact Factor of High Impact Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 24, no. 12: e43089. https://doi.org/10.2196/43089.

Else, Holly. 2021. “‘Tortured Phrases’ Give Away Fabricated Research Papers.” Nature 596, no. 7872: 328–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02134-0.

Fraser, Nicholas, Liam Brierley, Gautam Dey, Jessica K. Polka, Máté Pálfy, Federico Nanni, and Jonathon Alexis Coates. 2021. “The Evolving Role of Preprints in the Dissemination of Covid-19 Research and Their Impact on the Science Communication Landscape.” PLoS Biology 19, no. 4: e3000959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959.

Freckelton, Ian. 2020. “Covid-19: Fear, Quackery, False Representations and the Law.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 72, art. 101611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101611.

Gallagher, Ryan J., Larissa Doroshenko, Sarah Shugars, David Lazer, and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2021. “Sustained Online Amplification of Covid-19 Elites in the United States.” Social Media + Society 7, no. 2: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211024957.

Gupta, Latika, Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Olena Zimba, and Durga Prasanna Misra. 2020. “Scholarly publishing and Journal Targeting in the Time of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Rheumatologists and Other Specialists.” Rheumatology International 40, no. 12: 2023–2030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04718-x.

Haber, Noah A., Emma Clarke-Deelder, Avi Feller, Emily R. Smith, Joshua A. Salomon, Benjamin MacCormack-Gelles, Elizabeth M. Stone, et al. 2022. “Problems with Evidence Assessment in Covid-19 Health Policy Impact Evaluation: A Systematic Review of Study Design and Evidence Strength.” BMJ Open 12, no. 1: e053820. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053820.

Ioannidis, John P.A., Eran Bendavid, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Kevin W. Boyack, and Jeroen Baas. 2022. “Massive Covidization of Research Citations and the Citation Elite.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, no. 28: e2204074119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204074119.

Ioannidis, John P.A., Maia Salholz-Hillel, Kevin W. Boyack, and Jeroen Baas. 2021. “The Rapid, Massive Growth of Covid-19 Authors in the Scientific Literature.” Royal Society Open Science 8, no. 9, art. 210389. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210389.

Kambhampati, Srinivas B.S., Nagashree Vasudeva, Raju Vaishya, and Mohit Kumar Patralekh. 2021. “Top 50 Cited Articles on Covid-19 after the First Year of the Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome 15, no. 4, art. 102140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.05.013.

Khan, Hiba, Prakash Gupta, Olena Zimba, and Latika Gupta. 2022. “Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Retracted Articles on Covid-19.” Journal of Korean Medical Science 37, no. 6: e44. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e44.

Kricorian, Katherine, Rachel Civen, and Ozlem Equils. 2022. “Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Misinformation and Perceptions of Vaccine Safety.” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 18, no. 1, art. 1950504. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1950504.

Lee, Sun Kyong, Juhyung Sun, Seulki Jang, and Shane Connelly. 2022. “Misinformation of Covid-19 Vaccines and Vaccine Hesitancy.” Scientific Reports 12, no. 1, art. 13681. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17430-6.

Maillard, Alexis and Tristan Delory. 2022. “Blockbuster Effect of Covid-19 on the Impact Factor of Infectious Disease Journals.” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 28, no. 12: 1536–1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.011.

Marcum, James A. and Felix Tretter. 2023. “From Evidence-Based Corona Medicine to Organismic Systems Corona Medicine.” Philosophy of Medicine 4, no. 1: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.138.

NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information). 2023. LitCovid. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/.

Nelson, Lindsay, Honghan Ye, Anna Schwenn, Shinhyo Lee, Salsabil Arabi, and B. Ian Hutchins. 2022. “Robustness of Evidence Reported in Preprints during Peer Review.” The Lancet: Global Health 10, no. 11: e1684–e1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00368-0.

Pal, Jiban K. 2021. “Visualizing the Knowledge Outburst in Global Research on Covid-19.” Scientometrics 126, no. 5: 4173–4193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03912-3.

Peters-Burton, Erin E., Zoubeida R. Dagher, and Sibel Erduran. 2023. “Student, Teacher, and Scientist Views of the Scientific Enterprise: An Epistemic Network Re-analysis.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 21, no. 2: 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10254-w.

Rau, Nicole M., Mir A. Basir, and Kathryn E. Flynn. 2020. “Parental Understanding of Crucial Medical Jargon used in Prenatal Prematurity Counseling.” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 20, no. 1, art. 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01188-w.

Raynaud, Marc, Huanxi Zhang, Kevin Louis, Valentin Goutaudier, Jiali Wang, Quentin Dubourg, Yongcheng Wei, et al. 2021. “Covid-19-Related Medical Research: A Meta-Research and Critical Appraisal.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 21, no. 1, art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01190-w.

Rebeaud, Mathieu E., Florian Cova, Valentin Ruggeri, and Michaël Rochoy. 2022. “Raising Public Awareness about the Misuse of Predatory Journals: One Year after the ‘Hydroxychloroquine and Push-Scooters Accidents’ Hoax.” Therapie 77, no. 3: 373–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2021.10.009.

Retraction Watch. 2023. “Retracted Coronavirus (Covid-19) Papers.” https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/.

Schonhaut, Luisa, Italo Costa-Roldan, Ilan Oppenheimer, Vicente Pizarro, Dareen Han, and Franco Díaz. 2023. “Scientific Publication Speed and Retractions of Covid-19 Pandemic Original Articles.” Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública 46: e25. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.25.

Shamsi, Amrollah, Brady Daniel Lund, and Shohreh SeyyedHosseini. 2022. “Sharing of Retracted Covid-19 Articles: An Altmetric Study.” Journal of the Medical Library Association 110, no. 1: 97–102. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1269.

Shueb, Sheikh, Sumeer Gul, Nahida Tun Nisa, Taseen Shabir, Shafiq Ur Rehman, and Aabid Hussain. 2022. “Measuring the Funding Landscape of Covid-19 Research.” Library Hi Tech 40, no. 2: 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-04-2021-0136.

Taros, Trenton, Christopher Zoppo, Nathan Yee, Jack Hanna, and Christine MacGinnis. 2023. “Retracted Covid-19 Articles: Significantly More Cited than Other Articles within Their Journal of Origin.” Scientometrics 128, no. 1: 2935–2943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04707-4.

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. 2016. “An Error Is an Error … Is an Erratum: The Ethics of Not Correcting Errors in the Science Literature.” Publishing Research Quarterly 2, no. 3: 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9469-0.

———. 2021a. “An Alert to Covid-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 46, no. 5, art. 102187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102187.

———. 2021b. “The Importance for Journals to Publish Commentaries and Letters to the Editor in the Age of Covid-19.” International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 8, no. 7: 3725–3727. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20212637.

———. 2021c. “Silently Withdrawn or Retracted Preprints related to Covid-19 Are a Scholarly Threat and a Potential Public Health Risk: Theoretical Arguments and Suggested Recommendations.” Online Information Review 45, no. 4: 751–757. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0371.

———. 2022a. “Is Alzheimer’s Disease by Any Other Name Still Alzheimer’s Disease?” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. https://www.j-alz.com/content/alzheimers-disease-any-other-name-still-alzheimers-disease.

———. 2022b. “Tortured Phrases Dilute the Specificity of Medical Jargon.” Journal of Health and Social Sciences 7, no. 2: 137–140. https://doi.org/10.19204/2022/TRTR2.

———. 2022c. “‘Tortured Phrases’ in Post-publication Peer Review of Materials, Computer and Engineering Sciences Reveal Linguistic-Related Editing Problems.” Publishing Research 1, art. 6. https://doi.org/10.48130/PR-2022-0006.

———. 2023a. ““Corrosive” Acids, Inaccurate Forms of Salicylic, Jasmonic, Gibberellic and Abscisic Acids, in Plant Stress- and Plant Growth-Related Literature. SSRN (preprint, not peer reviewed): 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4409508.

———. 2023b. “Junk Science, Junk Journals, and Junk Publishing Management: Risk to Science’s Credibility.” Philosophia 51: 1701–1704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00590-0.

———. 2023c. “The Nomencluratural Misrepresentation of Parkinson’s Disease.” Neurological Sciences 44, no. 6: 2179–2180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06672-5.

———. 2023d. “‘Tortured Phrases’ in Preprints.” Current Medical Research & Opinion 39, no. 5: 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2023.2201098.

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti, and Panagiotis Tsigaris. 2021. “Optimizing Peer Review to Minimize the Risk of Retracting Covid-19-Related Literature.” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 24, no. 1: 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09990-z.

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. and Timothy Daly. 2023. “‘Tortured Phrases’ in the Neurosciences: A Call for Greater Vigilance.” Neuroscience Informatics 3, no. 2, art. 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuri.2023.100127.

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. and Hilary I. Okagbue. 2022. “Have Some Signatories of a Covid-19 Literature Open Access Agreement Reneged on Their Promise?” Edulib 12, no. 2: 114–122. https://doi.org/10.17509/edulib.v12i2.47333.

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., Panagiotis Tsigaris, and Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh. 2021. “Publishing Volumes in Major Databases related to Covid-19.” Scientometrics 126, no. 1: 831–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03675-3.

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. and Quan-Hoang Vuong. 2021. “Do Legitimate Publishers Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud?” Exchanges 8, no. 3: 55–68. https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v8i3.785.

Tiwari, Punit, and Harmeet Kaur. 2020. “The Flood of Covid-19 Publications: A Word of Caution.” SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine 2, no. 12: 2511–2513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00656-8.

Vervoort, Dominique, Xiya Ma, and Mark G. Shrime. 2020. “Money down the Drain: Predatory Publishing in the Covid-19 Era.” Canadian Journal of Public Health 111, no. 5: 665–666. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00411-5.

Wang, Weigang, Hu Wang, Tian Yao, Yandi Li, Linzhu Yi, Ying Gao, Jia Lian, Yongliang Feng, and Suping Wang. 2023. “The Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Covid-19 Vaccine: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Clinical and Experimental Medicine [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-023-01046-9.

Willoughby, Shannon D., Keith Johnson, and Leila Sterman. 2020. “Quantifying Scientific Jargon.” Public Understanding of Science 29, no. 1: 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520937436.

Zhang, Yun, Qun Wu, Ting Zhang, and Lingxiao Yang. 2022. “Vulnerability and Fraud: Evidence from the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Humanities & Social Sciences Communications 9, no. 1, art. 424. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01445-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-03

How to Cite

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2023). “Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature: Can They Serve as Epistemic Markers to Assess the Integrity of Biomedical Information?. Philosophy of Medicine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.164

Issue

Section

Perspectives